• Welcome to the message board of the City Council of Universal City. Section 551.006 of the Texas Gov’t Code allows communication or exchange of information between Councilmembers about business or public policy over which the Council has supervision or control if it does not constitute a meeting or deliberation. This communication must be in writing, posted to an online message board which is viewable and searchable by the public, and the communication is displayed in real time for no less than 30 days after the communication is posted. Only Universal City Councilmembers are allowed to post on this message board. Councilmembers shall not vote or take any action that is required to be taken at a meeting by posting on this message board. In no event shall a communication or posting to this message board be construed as an action of the City Council of Universal City.

Billboard Revenue

council3_rubal

Well-known member
Fellow Councilmembers,

I attached a document that suggests that $80k revenue per year the City receives from Billboard revenues should go to the City of Universal City and not specifically limited to the Golf Course fund.

This $80K per year from Billboard revenue would best be applied to the general fund to offset property taxes.

Thank you for your consideration in reviewing this document.

Please consider support for ensuring this revenue source is applied to the general fund to benefit all residents.
 

Attachments

I need to learn more about this. However, if it can go to anywhere especially the general fund then it should as opposed to another guaranteed income source for the golf course who already gets the venue tax.
 
I think staff have taken the position that it is on golf course land (or what was golf course land prior to the hotel). So, any income from it should stay golf.

I think there would need to be a little more research done on how we got the land in the first place. If the land was purchased with venue tax bonds, then perhaps it needs to stay with golf. My guess is that it was not tied to the venue tax otherwise the City may have not been able to sell the hotel property. In other words, if they could sell the hotel property then presumably the general fund could collect the income from the sign. That is a legal question though.

If it is not tied to the venue tax or bonds, then I would support moving it to the general fund.
 
Back
Top