• Welcome to the message board of the City Council of Universal City. Section 551.006 of the Texas Gov’t Code allows communication or exchange of information between Councilmembers about business or public policy over which the Council has supervision or control if it does not constitute a meeting or deliberation. This communication must be in writing, posted to an online message board which is viewable and searchable by the public, and the communication is displayed in real time for no less than 30 days after the communication is posted. Only Universal City Councilmembers are allowed to post on this message board. Councilmembers shall not vote or take any action that is required to be taken at a meeting by posting on this message board. In no event shall a communication or posting to this message board be construed as an action of the City Council of Universal City.

City Water Use Compliance Report HB 3693

council3_rubal

Well-known member
Fellow Council Members,
Reference: City Compliance Report Texas HB 3693

Please reference the City Compliance Report TX HB 3693 (attached) also link above.

This report includes the potable water use by our City (not residents or commercial use). It was noteworthy during the reporting period that there was an average sustained increase of 48% (increase 6.26 million gallons per year) between years 2020-2021 vs 2022-2024. I had a very good meeting with Randy and Athena, who provided the metered water readings for the years 2021-2022 for review. During these years 5.9M gallon per year increase was attributed to the increased need for parks during the drought. Years 2023 and 2024 were not reviewed.

According to SAWS: 117 GPCD per person translates to 117 gallons per person per day * 365 days/year = 42,705 gallons per person per year and 42,705 gallons per person per year / 325,851 gallons/acre-foot = approximately 0.0002 acre-feet per person per year. Suggesting that our irrigation use would be sufficient for potable water use by 35 families of 4.

Randy, stated that there was a plan to bring nonpotable parks. I am not sure of details, expense, or time frame at this time.
See the prior post regarding Edwards Aquifer allocation reductions for drought conditions.
 

Attachments

Additonal note: The increased irrigation cost for the potable water was greater than $26,000 per year. If the use of recycled water for parks is significantly delayed, it may be that Council will ultimately need to think beyond one-year drought restriction conditions and readdress City self-exemptions for high volume irrigation with potable water.
 
Back
Top